In April 2025, a photograph of grave stone spread over the network, where under the portrait of a man there is an inscription "illegally mobilized". The media and Telegram channels claim that the Ukrainian court demanded that the mother remake the monument from the mother. We checked the reliability of this story.
A photograph of the alleged tombstone of the deceased Ukrainian military became a viral on April 2. A portrait of a man is engraved on the stove, the name Grigory Vyacheslavovich Oleinik, the date of life and the signature “illegally mobilized” in Ukrainian. Along with this picture, the image of a document usually spreads, which states: information on the tombstone is recognized as defamatory honor and dignity, and the mother of the deceased soldier is obliged to delete the inscription at her own expense within five business days.
Similar posts were placed by such Telegram channels as "Skeptic"(141,000 views at the time of writing this analysis),"Ukraine.ru"(134,000),"Sheikh Tamir", (113,000)," "Kostyan Cat - Official Channel"(76 000),"Alexander Semchenko"(76 000) and"Gasparyan"(66 000). The media also reported on the trial "Another Ukraine","Military Review","Tsargrad" News.ru, "Notebook"And others. Some resources, for example Life.ru and Telegram channel "Sanya in Florida"(513,000 views), they just shared a photograph of the tombstone.
In Ukraine at least Since 2024 serious problems with mobilization are observed - they are declared and Officials, And Foreign partners Kyiv. To combat the lack of manpower at the front, the authorities are gradually changing the law: for example, since March 2025 Tighten Criteria for obtaining reservation and delay. Russian officials and propagandists often talk about the problems of Kyiv with mobilization, often retraining fakes on this topic, and “verified” regularly Disassembles Similar statements.
All Telegram channels and the media, who spoke about the alleged tombstone, publish the same photo of the grave plate. In front of her are flowers tied with yellow-blue ribbon, and Ukrainian flags stand on the sides. The tombstone indicates the date of death - February 10, 2025.
The second image is a picture of the decision of the Brovarsky inter -district court of the Kyiv region, which was issued on March 31, 2025. The lawsuit, follows from the document, was filed by the Brovarskaya Ritual Service utility company, and Olga Vladimirovna Oleinik is the defendant on it. Telegram channels and the media write that this is Grigory Oleinik's mother, whose grave is depicted in the first picture.
These two images (especially in combination with each other) cause a lot of questions. If you believe them, then from the moment of the alleged death of the Ukrainian military to the court’s sentence, about a month and a half has passed and during this time the mother of the deceased allegedly managed to receive the body of the son, bury him, order and erect a monument, cause the discontent of fellow citizens and even survive the judicial lawsuit from one of the ritual services of the Kyiv region. Even if we assume that the woman learned about the death of her child almost immediately (which is far from always feasible in conditions of hostilities) and received the body in the shortest possible time, for the manufacture and installation of tombstones Time needs. Ukrainian workshops call different deadlines, but usually ask them to give them two months, and also recommend that you wait a year from the moment of burial in order to give soil on the grave. In addition, the first photograph, according to this logic, was taken between February 10 and the end of March, but the picture has no traces of snow or slush, characteristic of the offseason in the Kyiv region.
At the same time, the alleged court order contains a large number of inaccuracies that are unusual for official papers. Firstly, the surname of the defendant and her son from the document differ from the surname of the military from the grave slab: in the court’s decree-Olizik, and on the monument-Oleinik. Secondly, the decision does not indicate the number of the case under consideration and there is not a single link to the legislative acts on the basis of which the decision was made. Thirdly, numerous grammatical errors are found in the text: for example, at the beginning of the document the word “head” is used instead of the correct “head” (“chairman”-Ukrainian), although in the end the word is given correctly.
Finally, the decision does not correspond to open data on Ukrainian judicial practice. So, it says that the case against Oleinik was administrative, but the Brovarsky inter -district court, judging by his site, mainly considers criminal processes or civil lawsuits, the decisions made by him on administrative offenses are rare (where more often they are engaged in them Kyiv District Administrative Court). The decision was signed by the chairman of the court D. D. Luzpensnik and judge O. V. Belokon. According to data from open sources, Dmitry Dmitrievich Lupannik occupies job title Secretary of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, in 2023 he is temporarily performed Responsibilities of the Chairman of the Supreme Court of the country. It is extremely unlikely that it was he who chaired by a meeting of the inter -district court in the Kyiv region in an administrative case. Moreover, all recent decisions can be found in the “Clean of Court Decisions” on the Ukrainian website Youcontrol, and there is no viral document there - as among decisions Brovarsky inter -district, so district administrative court.
Both pictures, as the reverse search in the image shows, initially appeared in the pro-Kremlin Telegram channels. The earliest fast, containing these photographs and the “tested” discovered, was posted on April 2 at 13:54 Moscow time in the Sheikh Tamir channel. He is regularly Found In the analysis of "tested" as a distributor and primary source of fake news. Further photographs appeared in other Russian -speaking channels and the media, as well as in X, Instagram And Tiktok. Images became popular in English -speaking SECTION SECTIONS.
FACECHERS from the Ukrainian project Stopfake Turned For the commentary to the Brovarsky Ritual Service, which was supposedly the plaintiff in the trial with Olga Oleinik. Representatives of the enterprise reported that they did not bury the military with that name, that they did not work in a cemetery from a viral photograph and that they did not participate in the courts. Chairman of the Brovarsky City Council Igor Sapozhko on his Facebook page declaredthat Grigory Oleinik’s soldier is not in the lists of the dead, nor among the laveled on the Alley of Glory in Brovary. There is no serviceman with such a name and date of death and in bases The dead Ukrainian military, information about which are collected by volunteers.
Despite these refutations, on April 7, another photograph of the tombstone spread in Telegram channels and the media, this time supposedly lying on the ground and doused with white paint. The signatures stated that activists in the Kyiv region destroyed Oleinik's burial due to the inscription about the illegality of mobilization. Similar records appeared in Telegram channels "Sheikh Tamir"(103,000 views),"Military report"(44,000),"Gasparyan"(39,000) and"Strong hazel"(20,000), as well as in social networks"Constantinople"And on the site"Another Ukraine".
There are no traces of destruction on the monument itself, and the paint is quite neatly distributed: it closes the portrait and part of the inscription, but did not fall into the grass or flowers. At the same time, in the picture you can see the same bouquet tied with a yellow-blue ribbon as in an earlier image. It looks strange that, although almost a week passed between the publication of the first and second pictures, the flowers remained as fresh and vandals gently shifted them to a destroyed monument. It is noteworthy that the date to which the court ordered to correct the inscription on the plate coincides with the date of the appearance of photographs of the destroyed tombstone on the network.
This image also spread mainly through Russian-speaking Telegram channels, the first post appeared In the Channel "Bear" on April 7 at 13:48 Moscow time. This channel is also repeatedly Facing In the analysis of "tested" as the source of misinformation. A picture with a tombstone demolished later Placed Irish journalist of the BOOUZ, known for his pro -Russian statements and cooperating with RT. According to him, the soldier’s grave was defiled several times, but the mother still did not agree to remove the inscription about illegal mobilization. Bowz did not write about the court decision.
Thus, the existence of the tombstone of the deceased Ukrainian soldier with the signature “illegally mobilized” and the trial arose because of this is not confirmed by data from authoritative sources. The pictures used as evidence, apparently, were forged, the text of the court decision contains a lot of errors and inaccuracies, and the document itself is not in the public domain. At the same time, the enterprise, which appears there as a plaintiff, refutes its participation in the process.
Photo on the cover: social networks
- Stopfake. Fake: Matir of the Beginning Ukrainian Vieisky Sudget for the Napi on the Pam’yatnik "illegally mobils"
- Meduza. "Hence the one - three hundred or two hundred"
- Is it true that in Ukraine they issued an advertisement offering to go to the army for the sake of subscribing to Netflix and the game currency in Roblox?
- Is it true that in the Kharkov region they awarded wives who "handed over" husbands to the military commissariat?
- Is it true that PCU offers to buy a prayer that protects against mobilization?
If you find a spelling or grammatical error, please inform us of this, highlighting the text with an error and by pressing Ctrl+Enter.
