Is it true that Pfizer issued a patent for remote tracking of contacts of all vaccinated?

The information is distributed that the American pharmaceutical company Pfizer registered a patent for remote tracking of the vaccinated. We decided to check if it corresponds to reality.

It is reported that the patent application was Approved August 31, 2021. The principle of the system Described So: “The vaccinated ones are now connected to the Internet ... through quantum communication of pulsating microwave frequencies of 2.4 GHz or higher from mobile tissue and satellites directly to graphene oxide contained in the fat tissues of all people who have received a vaccine.” Also Mentionedthat all vaccinated become “owners of the rarest passport of the biorobot and belong to Pfizer. She will now solve all your legal issues for you. ” Information about such a patent actively applies to various sites, V Blogs, messengers and social networks.

Patent application of August 31, 2021 really exists. She has two applicant author-Gal Erlich and Mair Fenster. On the Internet there is enough information about both of them. So, Gal Erlich, a graduate of the University of Jewish at Jerusalem and the Faculty of Law of Tel Aviv University, has a doctoral degree in genetic engineering. In 1995, he founded the company Ehrlich & Fenster, providing intellectual law services. Since 2017, he has been headed by Ehrlich, Neubauer and Melzer (EN&M), which specializes in technological solutions for intellectual property in the field of high technology. His colleague Mair Fenster He also graduated from Jewish University, and the magistracy was held in Bar-Ilan. At Ehrlich & Fenster, he heads the department of medical equipment. Neither Erlich nor Fenster never worked at Pfizer Corporation and are not related to the vaccine against coronaviral infection developed by Pfizer and Biontech. 

IN Description there is no mention of a patent. frequencynor towers cellular connectionnor oxide Grafena. However, with all these phenomena Related Different Conspirological theories that previously analyzed We And ours Colleagues. The patent does not stipulate any presentation of the biorobot passport to the vaccinated, as does not claim that the Pfizer pharmaceutical companies are now owned (which in itself would be extremely strange, because the authors of the patent have nothing to do with it).

If you carefully read the patent application, it becomes clear that Israeli scientists offer not to monitor the vaccinated. Information about the state of human health (chronic diseases, infections, allergies) is recorded on portable wearable devices, the specifics of his work are analyzed (for example, doctors and nurses, social workers, firefighters, police officers are identified in a separate category) and the presence of pregnancy or children's age is taken into account. The algorithm, receiving data on the frequency of contacts with other people, calculates the individual risk of infectious infectious disease, implies the severity of the course and presents recommendations for vaccination or other preventive actions. Applicants believe that such a system will allow you to predict flashes of infections, localize them or even prevent them. In the conditions of pandemia and a limited amount of vaccines, according to their plan, it will also allocate priority groups for vaccination.

Further, the authors describe the potential scenarios of the algorithm. There is no question in the application in the application, since the algorithm is recorded on a certain portable device (in the patent this is not specified, but it can be assumed that it can be, for example, a fitness bracelet or smart watches). Separately, it is worth stipulating that the proposed algorithm involves the anonymity of the participants. It is also worth noting that applications to track contacts to prevent the distribution of a new coronavirus infection exist for iOS and Android platforms, they are used in Australia, China, Colombia, Iceland, Israel, Norway, Singapore and a number of other countries.

Thus, in the message about the patent there is not a single true statement, except perhaps the date of its issuance. It does not belong to Pfizer and does not aim to track the contacts of vaccinated and even more to turn them into biorobots.

Fake

What do our verdicts mean?

Read on the topic:

1. Is it true that vaccinated can be seen using Bluetooth?
2. Is it true that vaccinated becomes the property of the owners of patents on vaccines?